How We Keep Content Accurate

MedNext content is drafted by NHS consultants and trainees, formatted for the platform and checked against up-to-date global guidance before publication.

Clinician review, current guidelines, formal governance

Clinician-drafted: our content is written by practising clinicians and checked against current guidelines. AI powers how students learn it, through study modes, practice and revision tools, not the clinical writing. No unreviewed AI output ever reaches learners.

Blueprint-aligned questions: our MCQs are mapped to the NEET-PG, INI-CET, FMGE and NExT blueprints and graded for difficulty, clinical relevance and syllabus alignment. Content is reviewed against the latest NMC, ICMR, WHO and national clinical practice guidelines, and updated as major guidelines are released.

  • 012

    chapters reviewed against current clinical guidelines

  • 0,234

    subjects across the full MBBS curriculum

  • 01

    MCQs written and reviewed by practising clinicians

Drug knowledge that is actually useful in India

Each learning resource should identify its educational scope, use recognised guidance and avoid claiming accreditation or formal endorsement that has not been confirmed.

Reported errors are checked against the source and corrected when verified, with the update focused on the affected material.

Get in touch

Are you a clinician, examiner or medical educator interested in reviewing content? We would like to hear from you.

How questions are made

Three principles govern every piece of content on MedNext: clinician-drafted material, blueprint-aligned questions, and current guidelines only.

Found something that looks wrong? Report it from any page in the app or write to support@mednext.academy. Verified errors are investigated and corrected promptly.