Legal
Editorial Policy
How MedNext Academy creates, sources and reviews its medical education content, and the limits of that content.
Explore MedNextEditorial Policy
MedNext Academy Private Limited (MedNext) publishes medical education content for students and healthcare professionals: structured chapters, revision notes, practice questions with explanations, cheat sheets and clinical-reference tools. This Editorial Policy explains how that content is created, sourced, reviewed and maintained, and what it is and is not for.
1. Scope and purpose. MedNext content is written to support structured learning and examination preparation, mapped to the competency-based curriculum published by the National Medical Commission and to the requirements of Indian postgraduate entrance examinations, while remaining useful to international learners. Content is educational: it is not medical advice, does not replace clinical training or supervision, and must never be used as the sole basis for a decision about a real patient.
2. How content is created. MedNext content is authored and owned by the MedNext Clinical Team. We use artificial intelligence tools, including large language models, as part of our authoring workflow to draft, structure and format educational material at scale. drafts are always directed by clinical specifications and reviewed by the team before publication; the clinical substance, accuracy and editorial judgement are human-owned, and no AI-generated output is published without clinical review. AI tools are used to accelerate production, not to replace clinical expertise. Question explanations are written to teach the underlying concept, not just to justify an answer key. Where AI is used in interactive features such as the Attending Simulator or Viva Coach, responses are generated in real time and are not individually pre-reviewed; see our Terms and Conditions, clause 10A, for the limitations that apply to those features.
3. Sourcing. Content is grounded in authoritative material: the published NMC competency framework, standard reference textbooks of each discipline, current clinical guidelines from recognised national and international bodies, and official examination notifications for exam-specific pages. Where exam policy is still evolving, such as proposed examinations, we say so and point readers to official notices rather than presenting speculation as fact.
4. Review and quality assurance. Content passes through review before publication, including checks for factual accuracy, internal consistency, alignment with the mapped competency, and clarity for the intended learner. We run periodic quality audits across the library to find and fix errors, and we prioritise anything with potential clinical-safety relevance, such as drug doses, first.
5. Updates and maintenance. Medicine changes, and so do examinations. Pages are updated when source guidelines or curricula change, when official examination notifications are revised, and when errors are reported and accepted. High-yield and exam-critical content is prioritised in each review cycle. Despite this, no library of this size is ever perfectly current, which is why every page should be read alongside up-to-date official guidance.
6. Independence. MedNext content decisions are made on educational merit. Our content is not sponsored, and we do not accept payment from pharmaceutical companies or other commercial interests to influence what our educational material says.
7. Corrections. We want to know when something is wrong. Our Correction Policy describes how to report a suspected error, how reports are triaged and reviewed, and how accepted corrections are published. Clinical-risk issues are always reviewed first.
8. Contact. For editorial questions, source queries or feedback on content, contact MedNext Academy Private Limited at support@mednext.academy.
Return to MedNext Academy
Explore MedNext-authored learning resources, structured revision and practice across the MedNext platform.
Explore MedNext